-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 681
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add anti-affinity for envoy deployed by provisioner #6148
Add anti-affinity for envoy deployed by provisioner #6148
Conversation
Signed-off-by: lubronzhan <lubronzhan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: lubronzhan <lubronzhan@gmail.com>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6148 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 78.52% 78.59% +0.07%
==========================================
Files 140 141 +1
Lines 19911 20198 +287
==========================================
+ Hits 15635 15875 +240
- Misses 3967 4012 +45
- Partials 309 311 +2
|
LGTM thx |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @lubronzhan! Just one comment that I'd like some input from other reviewers on as well.
Signed-off-by: Lubron Zhan <lubronzhan@gmail.com>
e59d515
to
b1497db
Compare
Signed-off-by: Lubron Zhan <lubronzhan@gmail.com>
otherwise LGTM |
Signed-off-by: Lubron Zhan <lubronzhan@gmail.com>
82f06d2
to
68770d6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM modulo Steve's requested change 👍🏽
Signed-off-by: Lubron Zhan <lubronzhan@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks @lubronzhan!
@sunjayBhatia, are you OK with merging this for the 1.28 release? Looks OK to me
+1 |
Fix #5558
Tested inside a kind cluster and checked the manifest of envoy deployment